The thesis
The marginal cost of producing working software has collapsed. The marginal cost of proving it is correct — and carrying it for the next five years — has not moved at all.
Two things happened at once. Code quality did not improve with code capability: between 2024 and 2026 frontier coding capability roughly doubled on SWE-bench Verified, while the security pass rate did not follow. In Summer 2026 testing the best-performing model of any tested reached 68%, meaning the strongest available model still introduced a known vulnerability in roughly one task in three — while producing code that compiles cleanly at close to a 100% rate.
And the constraint has already moved to review. 2026 field telemetry across roughly 22,000 developers shows median time in pull-request review up 441%, pull-request size up 51.3%, incidents per pull request up 242.7%, and 31% more pull requests merging with no review at all.
Enterprises have absorbed the risk without absorbing the control.
What we are asking you to do
Nothing new. ExaCollab is not a fresh exposure to take on — it is the first thing that measures the one you already carry, and, having measured it, the mechanism that lets you safely widen who is permitted to author change.
What we are not
A vendor asking to install software next to your production systems. ExaCollab is a multi-tenant SaaS control plane and nothing else. You build your own DEV environment, you operate your own integration endpoint, you run development in your own tooling with your own model access. We ship a contract — protocol, schemas, a reference implementation, a conformance suite, an attestation format — and we hold none of your estate.
What is still unproven
The golden corpus and the divergence-classification questions. They are the entire basis on which this should be funded or declined, and no amount of architectural cleverness affects them. We would rather lead with that.
Get in touch
The quickest way to reach us is the contact page.